A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
  • Load image into Gallery viewer, A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
  • Load image into Gallery viewer, A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
  • Load image into Gallery viewer, A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
  • Load image into Gallery viewer, A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
  • Load image into Gallery viewer, A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803
  • Load image into Gallery viewer, A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803

A Scottish Flank Company Officer’s Sword, 1803

Regular price
£4,300
Sale price
£4,300
Regular price
Sold out
Unit price
per 
Tax included.

Overall: 93cm (36.5in) 

A George III 1803 pattern flank officer's sabre, with curved, part-blued, fullered on each side, 76cm (30in) single-edged blade decorated in gilt with a trophy of arms, foliage swags, the Royal Arms and crowned GR cypher, inscribed with maker’s name ‘GIBSON / THOMSON / & CRAIG / WARRANTED’; gilt-brass stirrup-hilt with slotted guard pierced with scrolls and knuckle-guard with pierced 'GR' cypher, wire-bound grip and lion's-head pommel; contained in its gilt-brass mounted leather scabbard, the reverse of the locket impressed with 'GIBSON / THOMSON / & CRAIG / EDINBURGH' manufacturer's mark.

The development of the Pattern 1803 Flank Officer's sword originates with the formation of grenadier and light companies in the late 18th century. These were considered the elite of both the Foot Guards and line infantry, and could be detached and deployed separately. The grenadier company was the senior company of any infantry battalion and would typically lead an assault. When the battalion was deployed in line, the grenadier and light companies were deployed on the right and left flanks respectively, and both companies could be called upon to operate in looser formations and semi-independently. The added element of risk associated with detached skirmishing in looser formations meant that the officers of these companies needed a more robust fighting sword than the straight 1796 pattern.